XENOptics Logo
XENOptics Logo
XENOptics Logo

How Passive-Latching Optics
Slash Power Bills in Data Centers

Your fiber layer doesn’t need to sip power all day. Passive-latching optics use energy only while switching, then sit at ~6 W in standby—often reclaiming ~85–90% of “always-on” draw versus motorized cross-connects that hold power to maintain paths (assume ~50 W; validate on site). Result: lower OPEX, steadier SLAs, and zero-touch fiber provisioning from the NOC.

“6 W idle vs. 50 W continuous saves ~385 kWh per frame each year.”
*Assumes 50 W legacy standby. Validate against your installed baseline.

Benefit first: cut power, keep light

Think of it like a light switch that stays in position without power. The actuator moves once to make the connection, then locks in place—no electricity needed to maintain the path. If utility power blips mid-change, an onboard super-capacitor UPS completes the action, and latched circuits keep passing light.

  • Uses energy only while switching (spec peak 50 W), then falls back to ~6 W standby; OSP sleep mode drops to 0.1–0.5 W.
  • Switch cycle in tens of seconds (typ. 24–60 s), so power peaks are brief.
  • No battery maintenance—super-capacitors are long-life and maintenance-free.

Impact: up to ~85–90% reduction in fiber-layer power versus keep-alive motors (baseline dependent).

Quantify it: frame, room, campus

Per frame (illustrative): If your current units idle at ~50 W and passive-latching idles at ~6 W, the delta is 44 W.
Annual saving = 44 W × 8,760 h ≈ 385 kWh per frame.

Example roll-ups

  • MMR floor with 10 frames: ≈ 3,850 kWh/year.
  • Two-building campus with 20 frames: ≈ 7,700 kWh/year.
  • Cooling bonus: fewer idle watts in MMR/MDF zones = less heat to remove (improves PUE/DCiE at the margins).

Quote: “385 kWh/frame/year adds up fast across MMRs and MDFs.”

Notes: 50 W legacy standby is an assumption—measure your installed base to refine.

Zero-touch fiber provisioning (and why SLAs like it)

Provision, move, and rollback from software—no truck rolls, no manual patching windows.

  • Topology view, route calculation, queued tasks, audit log in web NMS/EMS; customer-facing interfaces = GUI, SNMPv2/v3, REST.
  • SSH/Telnet are internal support only, not customer access.
  • Switch completes in ~24–60 s, then returns to low power.
  • Field-replaceable modules enable service without taking light paths down.

Outcome: zero truck rolls for routine changes; predictable change windows; clean audit trails. See a live topology & queue demo.

SLA-driven fiber management

SLA stability starts with realistic optics. In connectorized deployments (standard), publish IL < 1.0 dB and RL ≄ 55 dB (UPC)—field numbers that keep budgets honest.

  • Latched paths ride through power events; in-flight commands finish on the super-cap UPS.
  • No embedded RFTS: testing integrates via your preferred third-party tools; the platform focuses on remote fiber management.

Impact: SLAs maintained through power events; fewer 3 AM escalations.

Mini-scenario: A power event hits at 02:07. With motorized holders, every active connection wants energy to stay put—risking drops. With passive-latching, paths remain locked; your NOC sees a completed task, not a cascade.

Density that tames growth (without re-cabling)

Scale fiber like software, not construction.

  • XSOS-288: 144×144 non-blocking; manage up to 1,728 ports/side (3,456 back-to-back) in a 19-inch rack.
  • XSOS-576D: 576 ports; near 7,000 managed ports with dual-side layouts.
  • Standard racks with retractable rails fit MMRs/MDFs, easing install and service.

Result: more capacity, less fiber chaos, no re-wire projects.

Micro-CTA: Map your MMR/MDF to 288/576 footprints → (layout options available).

Comparison at a glance

MetricTraditional Motorized*Passive-LatchingSavings
Standby power~50 W*~6 W~88%
Annual kWh / frame~438*~53~385
Power needed during outage to hold pathsRequired*None100%

*Assumptions for legacy gear. Validate your installed baseline before final ROI.

Where savings show up

  1. Energy – Idle draw falls toward ~6 W; OSP sleep hits 0.1–0.5 W.
  2. Cooling – Fewer steady watts in MMR/MDF reduce local thermal load.
  3. Labor – No hands-on patching for routine work; software queues do the rest.
  4. Risk – Latched connections persist; tasks complete under super-cap UPS.

Takeaway: reclaim most “always-on” fiber power while improving change control.

Deployment patterns that work

  • MMR (duplex) for high-density bidirectional cross-connects and tenant turn-ups.
  • MDF (simplex or duplex) depending on telco interconnect policies; polarity handled in software for simplex use cases.
  • Interfaces: GUI / SNMPv2/v3 / REST to NMS/EMS

Technical glossary

  • MMR (Meet-Me Room): Cross-connect room between carriers and tenants.
  • MDF (Main Distribution Frame): Vertical/horizontal fiber distribution hub per building/floor.
  • IL/RL: Insertion Loss / Return Loss—optical budget parameters (publish IL < 1.0 dB, RL ≄ 55 dB UPC in connectorized configs).
  • RFTS: Remote Fiber Test System (external 3rd-party tools; not embedded in the switch).

Stronger value proposition, section by section

  • Energy: Power only when switching; ~6 W standby afterward.
  • Resilience: Super-cap UPS completes tasks; latching preserves live light.
  • Operations: Zero-touch moves/adds/changes with full audit trails.
  • Scale: 288/576 fabrics manage thousands of ports per rack footprint.
  • Standards: Designed to meet NEBS 3 and ETSI 300019 Class 3.2; temperature cycling per IEC 60068-2-14 methodology.

Next steps

We’ll model your MMR/MDF inventory, measure idle power of current frames, and produce a line-item energy+labor ROI. Then we’ll map a phased migration to 288/576 latching fabrics in standard racks. Book a 30-minute savings assessment & remote online demonstration of the XSOS switches and Network Management System. 

Ready to Transform Your Network with XSOS?

XENOptics Logo
Company Links
Products
Solutions
Resources
Follow Us
XENOptics Logo White

© 2018-2025 XENOptics. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use.